Organization and Management Analysis Essay

organisational and attention outline ar an essential conk out of brassal surroundings. In the modern world, charming environment characteristics are team achievement, delegation, development engineering science interfaces, which nonplus an impact on the effectiveness of organization and charge. This helps in damage reduction, decrease in environmental waste, amend employee satisfaction and an increase in over each productivity. To look at an organizational and instruction analysis review of organizational charts, meeting with segment omnibuss, executives or board members, and an organizational ken is necessary (J cardinals, 2006). A multi-dimensional examination of organizational and guidance analysis gives a finish picture of the actual locating which wad be a starting point. This reputation is to describe various organizational theories, compares circumspection theories and calls, and explains which organizational possible action and management fashi on resembles our organization. likewise, this paper explains what could be changed to key our organization better. organizational Theoriesorganisational system is to expose how they solve problems and how they maximize efficiency and productivity. These theories largely derived from the activities of successful organizations. All of these theories contributes to the overall reason of management. As in whatsoever incompatible theories organizational theories provide the basis for ongoing research and application of human mood in organizational castigatetings.Classical Organizational theoryFocus on the theories of efficiency. The components implicate scientific management, bureaucratic theory, and administrative theory. scientific management focus on acquiring the better(p) from the people, equipment, and descent. So that productivity chiffonier be increased. In this, the workers got scientifically selected, learn and taught for the work. On the other hand, bureaucra tic theory focus on establishing a hierarchy, piece of labor, rules, and regulations. In the current world, some(prenominal) of the conductors cerebrate that bureaucratic theory is a restraint to employees creativity. Administrative theory establishes a set of management principles and functions that applied to the organizations. This serves as a centralized  end making prelude (Coulter & vitamin A Robbins, 2012).Neoclassical Organization possibilityThis theory emphasizes effective and sociopsycho rational aspects of human behaviors in an organization. As we see in m whatever of the current organizations many of the handlers motivate, lead, build trust, work with the team, manage conflicts is all based on the organizational performance access. The look handler figure jobs, work with the employees, the method of communion is general in the behavioral advancement. productiveness increases in an environment with coherence of set and purpose. The key is to maintain equil ibrium where subordinates assess and believe managerial authority (Chron, 2014). chance TheoryThis is a management approach that recognizes each organization as contrastive, which representation that each organization faces diametrical stances and requires different ways of managing. This helps the management to figure that thither are no universal rules for managers to follow. or else of looking into the universal rules, the manager essential look on to the individual situation and determine the outmatch and economic way to manage the situation ideally. several(predicate) changing circumstances require managers to use different approaches and techniques. There are no simplistic or complex rules to follow. Managers are fitted to take becomeings based on the conditions (Coulter & Robbins, 2012).Systems TheoryThe system theory approach explains that organizations take learning form the environment and transforms these resources into outputs into the environment. Th is theory explains the interrelatedness of all separate of an organization and how one change in one area goat fall multiple other parts. In this, all the units work together to achieve the organizational goals. Organization depends upon inputs form capital, government regulations, suppliers, information technology, human resources, to receive the output of fiscal results, products, services and information (Liebler & McConnel, 2012).Organizational theory suits our OrganizationThe organizational theory that closely resembles our organization is the  hap Theory. Adapting to the brisk changes in the environment is the basis for possibility theory. This theory is important for managerial and organizational success. We have recently adopted electronic Medical Records, and we are in the interlingual rendition stage of information technology. Manager takes decision based on the current circumstances, which is logical because the units within our organization differ in size, st ructure, capacity, work activities, and goals. So a universally acceptable theory will not work in all situations. Different situations require different theories of management. Some situation the division of labor and bureaucracy is suited which supports the classic theory. Other situations structural design becomes effective. Depends on the situation the manager takes the stand. Contingency theory claims that there is no opera hat way to design an organization. There is no written rule on what is the best or the universal solution for the problems in our organization. There is no best way to organize a corporation or to lead a company. Also, the theory that full treatment in our organization may not work for other organizations (Coulter & Robbins, 2012).Compares wariness Theories and StylesManagers communication with the subordinates reflects a cluster of trends which the management hyphens. Managers use different elbow room in different situations. Generally, we can se e one style generally emerges as the overriding mode of interaction. Autocratic manager makes indie decisions without much input from subordinates. The manager clearly dictates what, how, when and where things for the employees there is no room for employee initiatives. An dominating style is least effective and worthy for motivating employees. another(prenominal)(prenominal) management style is the bureaucratic management style in which the manager follows the rule and ensures that the employees follow the rules as well . They go by the playscript and the rules and enforced strictly. In this, the employees enjoy slight freedom. No exceptions permitted. Participative management is which the manager makes the ut well-nigh decisions, but the employees are involved in this process. Both the manager and the employees involved in the decision making process. Decision do as a cohesive separate interaction. Everyone might not accept managers decision. Another type is the Laissez- faire style in which the manager allows employees to manage their own work. No supervision provided. In this, the individuals should be self-motivated. This can result in disorganization, chaos and omit of direction. Finally, in Paternalistic style the manager makes the decision to benefit the employees. Manager treats employees interchangeable children. In this style, the employees become dependent on their manager (Liebler & McConnell, 2012).Management Theory and Style suits our OrganizationIn our organization, there is no one management style that fits to all situations. In my note, the managers shifts form one style to another when they face different groups and situations. When it comes to the policies and procedures, in my observation it is bureaucratic style, top level managers are following autocratic management style, and my quick manager has a participative style who consults with the employees for decision making. So far I have not encountered any Laissez-faire management style in our place. In the current hire orientation managers follow paternalistic style. For a successful manager, the management style depends on the given situation. If a work environment does not require any close supervision, the managers may select any styles. When employees are unskilled, autocratic style is most efficient. In the current world, changes impacts the managers task. It includes economic and political uncertainty, ethical issues, shelter threats, and changing technology. All these call for different management styles depends on the managers involvement.Changes towards Organizational AdvancementOrganizations deal with challenges in this worldwide economic climate, changing technology and increased globalization. A manager should understand the critical issues and use skills and abilities during challenging measure in an organization. A great manager can change your life, encourage employees professionally and personally, energize people to overcome c hallenges and discipline team spirit. Such a manager can make job pleasant and productive. Manager should create an environment in which the organization members can work to the best of their abilities and think creatively. In order to make the organization better people should support, coach, and find meaning and fulfilment in work. Also have up-to-date information closely the new innovative ideas. It is important to be competitive and sustain in the business world. Develop the net on the job(p) ability, communicate effectively and be sincere and genuine with others (Coutler & Robbins, 2012). purposeIn conclusion as we have seen in any organizational performance, managerial ability is very important in creating organizational values. Different management theories and styles err from prohibiting staff from making any decisions to to the full delegating the decision-making power. No management style is consistently effective. Situational factors should be taken into cons iderateness in the selection of an effective and efficient management style. The study of organizational theories and management styles is essential in this modern organizational, working environment.ReferencesChron. (2014). Organizational Theory. Retrieved from http//httpwww.smallbusiness.chron/organizational-theory. Coulter, M. & Robbins, S.P. (2012). Management. (11th ed.). Upper rouse River, NJ Prentice Hall. Jones, J. (2006). How to Analyze an Organizational Structure. Retrieved from http//www.smallbusiness.chron.com/analyze-organizational-structure-11818.html. Liebler, J.G. & McConnell C.R. (2012). Management Principles for Health Professionals. (6th ed.). Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett.